A story that belongs to this building
Your rooms, your staff roles, your garden, your quirks. We will use real photography wherever it is fit to use, and we will not paper over a tired wing with stock.
Care websites · AI- and answer-ready
The website is often the first visit. It should feel like a well-run home: warm, orderly, and specific. We build sites that help families decide, and that give search engines and AI assistants facts rather than adjectives.
If the copy could be reused on a hotel, it is not doing its job. Care sites fail when they hide the practicalities — who the home is for, how funding works, what a typical day looks like — behind lifestyle photography that was shot in a different county.
Your rooms, your staff roles, your garden, your quirks. We will use real photography wherever it is fit to use, and we will not paper over a tired wing with stock.
Types of care, fees and funding, a typical day, visiting, admissions, and how to raise a concern. Written in plain British English, not commissioning-speak.
Large enough type, strong contrast, reduced-motion respect, and Core Web Vitals that do not collapse when a photo gallery is opened. This audience includes people who are tired and people who are older.
LocalBusiness/NursingHome schema where it applies, FAQs that are real, and pages that state facts in a way a model can lift without mangling.
A focused home site typically lands in the £2–3k range. Groups needing a template plus several location pages sit towards the upper mid-project band. We would rather launch an honest home well than a network of thin clones.
Yes, if each location still gets its own facts, photos and CQC context. A shared system is fine. Shared fiction is not.
If they help and you can keep them truthful. A stale “rooms available” badge is worse than none. We will wire what the home can maintain.
Directly, without euphemism piled on euphemism, and without fear-mongering. Families are already frightened. Clarity is the kindness.
No. A structured intake, a visit or a thorough photo/content pass, then design and build. Care teams do not have time for a twelve-stakeholder brand odyssey.
Next step
Audits from about £700. Websites about £2–3k. Retainers from about £750/month. If a rebuild is the better path, we will say so before anyone is out of pocket.